Who wins and who loses after selfish development decisions are tallied?
The tedium associated with the ongoing debate between proponents of Smart Growth and its detractors can be argued in a more "rational" arena by placing the opposing perspectives in the context of the newly revived "Prisoner's Dilemma" as presented in last year's movie "A Beautiful Mind." Since the issue of personal choice is commonly bantered about in these circular arguments, why not make the final measurement via a zero-sum analysis.
The dilemma captures the net benefit of choice: if two prisoners, separated and interrogated, choose to cooperate by not ratting on one another, they will both benefit by obtaining a lighter sentence (e.g. 5 points each). If, however, one cooperates and the other does not, the latter wins (10 points) and the cooperator gets nailed (-10 points.) If they both rat on each other, they both go to jail for a long period of time, but the net sum is a wash (0 points).
Now I am but a simple planner, and do not purport to have this theory down pat, but I will present the first crack at the analysis in order to get the ball rolling.
First, let us make the two prisoners potential homeowners. Each is given the choice to either: a.) build a dream home with no capacity limitation with respect to land area and the amount of resources and infrastructure required; or b.) build a more modest dwelling that consumes less space and resources.
If both refuse to cooperate, which is the purported rational choice of the individual (because they stand to gain so much more), then the world would consist of immense, resource-intensive houses built over huge tracts of land. By Prisoner's Dilemma standards, this is a zero sum result with no benefit.
If one cooperates by building a modest house and the other opts to build a large mansion in the suburbs, then the defector wins by acquiring the goodwill of the former.
If they both cooperate, neither would have their dream house, yet both would experience a modest gain.
Thus the Prisoner's Dilemma illustrates unequivocally the benefits of cooperation over “selfishness." (Note that these terms are widely used by Dilemma theorists.)
In an effort to stir it up just a bit more, I wish to include in the debate the notion of sub-optimization: the theory that suggests the cooperative model only works in the long term since time is required to reveal the obvious benefits of cooperation. The theory purports that in the short term, the "rational" response is the "selfish" option simply because the net gain is so extraordinary and the benefits of the alternative are not apparent.
Therefore, I suggest that the Smart Growth planners have stepped forward as the interim guardians of the cooperative model while the fruits of cooperative labors are only fledgling. Once realized, the onerous, heavy handed regulations, guidelines and legally binding Official Community Plans that planners foist upon citizenry, may, eventually, fade into oblivion as citizens will naturally choose cooperation over selfishness, if for no other reason than the apparent zero-sum advantage.
Susan Hallatt works as a community planner for the transportation engineering firm Boulevard Transportation Group.

Trump Administration Could Effectively End Housing Voucher Program
Federal officials are eyeing major cuts to the Section 8 program that helps millions of low-income households pay rent.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Ken Jennings Launches Transit Web Series
The Jeopardy champ wants you to ride public transit.

Washington Legislature Passes Rent Increase Cap
A bill that caps rent increases at 7 percent plus inflation is headed to the governor’s desk.

From Planning to Action: How LA County Is Rethinking Climate Resilience
Chief Sustainability Officer Rita Kampalath outlines the County’s shift from planning to implementation in its climate resilience efforts, emphasizing cross-departmental coordination, updated recovery strategies, and the need for flexible funding.

New Mexico Aging Department Commits to Helping Seniors Age ‘In Place’ and ‘Autonomously’ in New Draft Plan
As New Mexico’s population of seniors continues to grow, the state’s aging department is proposing expanded initiatives to help seniors maintain their autonomy while also supporting family caregivers.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Ada County Highway District
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
