If You Want Accurate Traffic Projections, Don't Listen to DOTs
Analysis by the State Smart Transportation Initiative (SSTI) finds that the traffic projections used by state and local transportation agencies, which form the basis for spending priorities, are consistently higher than actual results.
"Forecasts and assumptions about ever-increasing traffic are often used to justify agency decisions to expand roads. But these assumptions are increasingly divorced from reality," reports Angie Schmitt. "In fact, state and regional agencies aren’t just wrong some of the time. State DOTs and metropolitan planning organizations are getting it wrong every year, over and over again, by significant margins, according to SSTI’s analysis."
Published on Tuesday, December 17, 2013 in
- New Supertall Skyscraper Coming to Manhattan
- New Laws Amount to Single-Family Zoning Ban in California
- Leadership in Urban Planning, After Two Successful Stints as a Planning Director
- Light Rail Could Finally Get Priority Over Cars at Intersections in Los Angeles
- Governor's Veto Kills Complete Streets Requirements for Caltrans
- Why the Poor Cannot Move: It's Not Just the (Official) Rent
- Coastal City Rejects 'Managed Retreat' Strategy
- Miracle on 14th Street
- Seattle on a Roll With New Bus Lanes
- Largest Condo High-Rise Since the Recession Planned for Chicago's Michigan Ave
- Massive Discrepancies Identified in Official Homeless Counts
- Is NIMBY-Shaming a Viable Housing Strategy?
- Neighborhood Responds as Gentrification Concerns Spread in Cincinnati
- A Transit Consultant's Take on Flying Cars
- More Than One North American Political Campaign Ignoring Housing and Transit
- Social Equity Cited in Veto of California Road Pricing Bill
- The Central Park Squirrel Census
- The Interior Secretary's Past Lobbying Work Scrutinized
- New Commute Data: Telecommuting on the Rise
- Governor's Transportation and Climate Actions Stir Controversy in California
