Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Education

Is San Francisco’s Transit-First Policy Facing a Midlife Crisis?

Driving accounts for 62 percent of all trips in San Francisco - the same level as when the city's pioneering transit-first policy was adopted 40 years ago. Aaron Bialick looks at the reasons why the policy has led to "scant visible progress."
March 25, 2013, 10am PDT | Jonathan Nettler | @nettsj
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments

"When the San Francisco Board of Supervisors adopted a transit-first policy on March 19, 1973 — 40 years ago this week — a return to the early 1900s streetscape may not have been what they had in mind, but the city’s intent to undo decades of urban planning and governance geared towards promoting driving at the expense of public transit was clear," notes Bialick. "A key provision of the policy reads, 'Decisions regarding the use of limited public street and sidewalk space shall encourage the use of public rights of way by pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit, and shall strive to reduce traffic and improve public health and safety.' (The policy was amended to include pedestrians and bicyclists in 1999.)"

"Yet today, the vast majority of San Francisco’s street space remains devoted to moving and storing private automobiles, making the public right-of-way hostile to walking and bicycling," he adds. "Muni remains underfunded, with vehicle breakdowns and delays caused by car traffic a daily part of riding transit."

While the SFMTA, elected officials, and city residents are all blamed for the lack of progress, some like Supervisor Scott Wiener are working to put muscle behind a policy that many feel was ahead of its time. 

"If San Francisco were to be graded on its implementation of transit-first, 'I would give us a C+,' said Wiener. 'In a lot of areas, the MTA is moving in the right direction, but it needs to move faster and more aggressively.'"

Full Story:
Published on Friday, March 22, 2013 in SF.Streetsblog
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email