As cities across the world expand their infrastructure to support more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly environments, outdated laws still support the use of streets by automobiles over people.
In most states, when a pedestrian or bicyclist is struck and killed by a moving vehicle, the driver of the vehicle can often leave the scene "without criminal charges, civil liabilities or administrative penalties." With cities across the country seeking to make their streets more accessible to all users, Alex Marshall argues that, "Without laws protecting bikers and walkers, however, the goal of having truly livable cities in America remains out of reach."
"Right now bikers -- and, to some extent, pedestrians -- are in a
Catch-22," writes Marshall. "It's long been known that there is a 'safety in numbers'
phenomenon. The more people walk or bike, the more the drivers of cars
look out for them. But people won't ride bicycles if it's not safe, and
it's not safe because people don't ride bicycles. A big step forward is
to put the primary responsibility for keeping streets safe on the
drivers of the two- and 10-ton vehicles that routinely kill people."
Marshall looks to Europe, where "cycling is an integral part of life," for a potential legal solution - "strict liability."
"It [strict liability] means that if you, the driver, strike a pedestrian or cyclist, you
are automatically at fault, even if the walker or cyclist literally
jumps out in front of you. This may not seem fair, but a system where a
cyclist and a driver are on equal footing is not a fair one either,
because the results of any collision are so unequal. A system needs to
acknowledge that it is the driver of a car or truck that is doing
something inherently dangerous."
FULL STORY: Bikers, Walkers Need Cities to Protect Them

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

Cal Fire Chatbot Fails to Answer Basic Questions
An AI chatbot designed to provide information about wildfires can’t answer questions about evacuation orders, among other problems.

What Happens if Trump Kills Section 8?
The Trump admin aims to slash federal rental aid by nearly half and shift distribution to states. Experts warn this could spike homelessness and destabilize communities nationwide.

Sean Duffy Targets Rainbow Crosswalks in Road Safety Efforts
Despite evidence that colorful crosswalks actually improve intersection safety — and the lack of almost any crosswalks at all on the nation’s most dangerous arterial roads — U.S. Transportation Secretary Duffy is calling on states to remove them.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Gallatin County Department of Planning & Community Development
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie