Cato Hosts Affordable Housing Battle Royale
This past week, the Cato Institute and Next American City played host to an energetic discussion of the role of housing and development policy in controlling the supply of affordable housing in American cities.
Featuring authors Ryan Avent, Adam Gordon, Randal O'Toole, and Matthew Yglesias, who come at the issue from a divergent set of ideological backgrounds, the discussion focused on the debate over whether "government tools, such as zoning and subsidies, have limited people's access to desirable, affordable housing" or whether markets alone can be trusted to "create socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable communities."
Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, June 13, 2012 in
- City Planning Technology, 2019 Benchmarking Study
- Biking and Walking Have Lost Momentum
- No, Traffic Congestion Does Not Really Cost Every American $1,348 Annually
- Daniel Burnham: Appearing Soon on Television Screens
- A Good Read for Planners and Peers: Why Old Places Matter
- Mapping the Wealth Accumulation of Homeowners
- Updated: What the Green New Deal Means for Planning
- A Case for Giving Midsized Metro Areas More Attention
- Gov. Gavin Newsom to Dramatically Downsize High-Speed Rail Project
- Needed: Better Data on Local Zoning Regulations
- New Report on San Francisco Transportation Trends: Driving on the Rise
- Deep Economic and Racial Injustice Found in California Pollution Exposure
- More Bad Polling News for Cordon Area Congestion Pricing in the U.S.
- Federal Subpoenas for Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation
- Plans for an 'Urban Town' in the Silicon Valley
- L.A. Collects Green Bonafides By Canceling Plans for Natural Gas Power
- Post-Recession Migration Patterns of Younger and Older Americans
- HUD Official Moves From Trump Plaza to New York Public Housing
- Allowing, and Permitting, Rooming Houses Could Solve Multiple Problems at Once
- Friday Funny: Pity the Fool Who Doesn't Yield to a Law-Abiding Pedestrian
