Is New York Worthy of Cultural Top Billing?

With New York's economic relevance firmly established, Jennifer Schuessler reports on a recent event held at the Public Theater this past week to discuss the city's cultural relevance. On hand were four cultural critics from New York magazine, who each opined on whether the city deserves to be called the cultural capital of America, let alone the world.

"'No,' said Jerry Saltz, the magazine's art critic. 'It's one of
several,' said Amy Larocca, its fashion editor. Kurt Andersen, a
longtime contributor to the magazine and host of the radio show 'Studio 360,'
was less equivocal, but only barely. 'Sure,' he said, but not as much
as New York was in, say, 1960. 'Now there are more alternatives,' he
said."

"Justin Davidson, New York's architecture and classical music
critic, also noted that the city's vitality did not stem entirely from
the creative classes. 'Artists are just among the many people who
come here," he said. "If you look at a place like Times Square, it might
look like the interesting edges are gone, but it's still a magnet for
the world, drawing all sorts of people internationally. The greatness of
the city is in its unevenness.'"