Paul Stenquist analyzes the surprising influence that geography has on the carbon footprint of electric vehicles.
As Americans increasingly turn to electric vehicles due to rising gas costs and interest in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, a new report shows that another set of calculations should be considered. The report, released by the Union of Concerned Scientists on Monday, shows that "the effect of electric vehicles on the amount of greenhouse gases released into the environment can span a wide range, varying with the source of the electricity that charges them. "
Their well-to-wheels analysis considers the full cycle of energy production. "It demonstrates that in areas where the electric utility relies on natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric or renewable sources to power its generators, the potential for electric cars and plug-in hybrids to reduce carbon dioxide emissions is great. But where generators are powered by burning a high percentage of coal, electric cars may not be even as good as the latest gasoline models - and far short of the thriftiest hybrids."
Stenquist examines the geographical breakdown of electricity generation. Electricity in the midsection of the U.S. is generated in large part by coal, while cities like Seattle and Los Angeles, and surprisingly, Buffalo and New Orleans, are in regions where there is cleaner power.
According to data released in 2010 by the United States Energy Information Administration, "45 percent of the country's electricity is generated by burning coal, the dirtiest fuel. Natural gas, a much cleaner fuel, accounts for 24 percent of electricity production, a figure that is shifting rapidly with price swings. Nuclear plants generate 20 percent of the nation's power, while wind, solar and geothermal sources provide 3 percent." While these numbers help to educate, they also affirm the need for changes in electric power generation in order to maximize the use of electric and hybrid cars.
FULL STORY: How Green Are Electric Cars? Depends on Where You Plug In

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)