After reading this story about a transit agency surveying their customers, I thought to myself: do riders really want another survey asking whether they are satisfied or how clean the stations are? Although clean stations are certainly better than unclean stations, I suspect that these are not transit riders' major priorities. (And when I say "transit riders" I really of course mean "myself").
After reading this story about a transit agency surveying their customers, I thought to myself: do riders really want another survey asking whether they are satisfied or how clean the stations are? Although clean stations are certainly better than unclean stations, I suspect that these are not transit riders' major priorities. (And when I say "transit riders" I really of course mean "myself").
A bus is not a home. A bus (or train) is someplace you spend a few minutes in on the way to home or work (or some other destination). So the most important thing about a bus or train is whether it gets you to your ultimate destination quickly and reliably.
If I am right, the most important thing about my transit service is whether it stays quick and reliable by surviving the next round of budget cuts.(1) So maybe transit authorities should be surveying their customers about how to deal with austerity. For example, a transit authority could ask customers whether, assuming other government agencies will not close a gap between revenues and spending, the authority should solve that revenue gap through:
*raising fares by amount X (X being the amount needed to close the revenue gap)
*eliminating bus routes X, Y and Z (X, Y and Z being the bus routes most likely to be eliminated)
*increasing headways (time between buses), and/or
*curtailing late-night service (and of course whatever other options the transit authority might consider!)
These sorts of questions would certainly be of more interest to me than a survey asking how satisfied I am.
(1) Or, in good times, is improved as revenue grows.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
‘Going backwards:’ Baltimore mayor, students rally against state's transit funding plan
Maryland's proposed six-year plan provides no funding for Baltimore’s BMORE bus program and reduces its road maintenance funding.
Detroit to transform waterfront with $2.2 billion investment
Developers will convert about 18 acres of unused parking lot space into civic spaces.
LA to transform part of water treatment facility into new park
By rebuilding some of the Los Angeles-Glendale Water Reclamation Plant’s infrastructure, the city will free up 18,000 square feet to create a new green space for the public.
San Antonio approves $1.1 billion transit agenda
The agency has also begun construction of its Via Rapid Green line, which will service passengers from the San Antonio International Airport.
Guerilla urbanists’ DIY benches joined by sanctioned seats in Chicago
The group behind the original homemade benches said they will continue installing them across bench-less bus stops in Chicago.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
One Hundred Miles
County of Mendocino
planning NEXT
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
Montrose County
Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA)
The Pocatello Development Authority