In this op-ed, a builders association representative argues that proposals for inclusionary zoning laws in Minnesota that require a certain percentage of affordable housing do not achieve the goals they aim for.
"Current expressions of "inclusionary mandated zoning" unfairly and inequitably transfer a societal goal to a subset of the population. It's far from clear that inclusionary zoning (IZ) is a good way to close the gap between the housing that working families can afford and the housing that's available to them."
"In essence, IZ refers to municipal zoning ordinances requiring that a certain portion of a new residential development be set at a price achievable by low-income families. Typically, the price must be affordable to a family with 80 percent or less of the area's median family income. This price is often substantially below builders' costs. While inclusionary zoning appears superficially appealing, the losses sustained by builders on "affordable" units must be made up by higher prices on the newly built market-rate units. The higher price is effectively a "tax" on new market-rate housing."
"Mandatory IZ ordinances do not work in the market and are not authorized by Minnesota law. If a community seeks to provide housing to those with lower income levels, the best means is through existing housing stock. It is not sound policy to balance the needs of a community on new developments when the greatest resource is in preserving existing housing."
"In practice, IZ hasn't worked as intended, either. In Burlington, Vt., where inclusionary zoning has been in effect for 15 years, a total of 180 units - or 12 units a year - have been built. And in Montgomery County, Md., which has a population of almost a million, about 300 units per year are being built. Clearly, IZ is not likely to result in much new affordable housing."
FULL STORY: Mandatory 'inclusionary zoning' doesn't work, and is unfair, to boot
How to Abolish Parking Minimums: Lessons from the Twin Cities
Cities around the country are eliminating parking minimums in an effort to reduce the costs of housing construction and encourage car-free living.
Twin Cities ADU Construction Slow, but Expected
Easing ADU regulations has led to some new construction in the Twin Cities, but the additional units have made a small dent in the area’s affordable housing problem.
Looking Back on 60 Years of Land Development in the Twin Cities
In 1960, about 12 percent of the Twin Cities metro's land was already developed. By 2020, about 34 percent had been developed. Many factors influenced how the region has changed since 1960.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.
Amtrak Cutting Jobs, Funding to High-Speed Rail
The agency plans to cut 10 percent of its workforce and has confirmed it will not fund new high-speed rail projects.
Ohio Forces Data Centers to Prepay for Power
Utilities are calling on states to hold data center operators responsible for new energy demands to prevent leaving consumers on the hook for their bills.
MARTA CEO Steps Down Amid Citizenship Concerns
MARTA’s board announced Thursday that its chief, who is from Canada, is resigning due to questions about his immigration status.
Silicon Valley ‘Bike Superhighway’ Awarded $14M State Grant
A Caltrans grant brings the 10-mile Central Bikeway project connecting Santa Clara and East San Jose closer to fruition.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Caltrans
City of Fort Worth
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie