WTC a 'Planning Catastrophe'?
The controversy over what to build at ground zero has been complicated, but is also "very New York". The real catastrophe would be to let the crater sit empty any longer than it must.
"While the building has yet to begin in earnest in the hole we call Ground Zero, a new conventional wisdom about it has been born: the disaster of destruction has been made worse by the disaster of reconstruction...But it is not a catastrophe, and the process under way could still result in a concentration of magnificent architecture."
Thanks to Michael Dudley
Full Story:
Published on Thursday, June 2, 2005 in
Topics
- Is There a Perfect Density?
- Aurora Rising
- Friday Funny: Satirizing the War on Cars
- 100-Year-Old Law Explains Why There Are So Many Trucks on the Highway
- Imagine: A City Built for Cycling
- Six States Considered Laws to Make it Legal to Run Over Protestors This Year
- How Not to Do a Pedestrian Safety PSA
- $604 Million Makeover Coming to San Francisco's Market Street
- New Community Plan Poises Downtown L.A. for Transformation
- Five Big Ideas About the Future of Transportation and Land Use in Los Angeles
- When Men Control the Debate About the Future of Cities
- Design Competition Yields a New Look for the Proposed Triboro Transit Line
- Testing New 'High Tech Security Screening' for Transit Users
- Study Sheds Light on the Effect of Streetlights on Crime
- County Gas Taxes at Work in Florida
- Trump's Infrastructure Plan Slow to Materialize Despite New Executive Order, Flow Chart
- Is Brownfield Development Health Risk Tolerance Out of Whack?
- Maine Town of Brunswick Completes Zoning Code Rewrite
- New Orleans Stormwater Systems Failing Again
- Corridors Are the Secret to Improving Transit in Small Cities
