The War Against Wal-Mart Is Silly
Planners may rail against Wal-Mart, but residents vote with their cash.
"The latest front in the Wal-Mart Wars was in the Los Angeles suburb of Inglewood. Activists screamed about a Wal-Mart proposal to build one of its superstores on 60 barren acres. Replacing barren acres with almost anything short of smut shops or crack houses would seem to be a good thing by definition, but not by the twisted logic that obtains when Wal-Mart is involved... If Wal-Mart seems unstoppable, there is one force that will be its undoing, and it's not angry protests."
Thanks to Laura Kranz
Full Story:
Published on Thursday, April 8, 2004 in
- Home Builders Aren't Building the Smaller Homes the Market Wants
- Recycling Is Cancelled
- Review: The Hudson Yards Mega-Development, Open to the Public Today
- Proposed Mega-Development Would Expand Chicago's Skyline
- It Takes a Fatality to Remove On-Street Parking
- Study: Density Can Impede Growth
- 'Urban Luxury' Housing Skyrockets in Texas and Beyond
- Seattle Gives Final Approval to 27 Upzones
- Many Norms, Few Plans: Urban Rubble Clearance in the Cities of the Global South
- Concrete’s Contribution to the Rise and Decline of Civilization
- After Decades of Planning: New Life for K Street Transitway in Washington, D.C.
- Reducing Motor Vehicle Traffic in Cities
- Bill Would Phase-Out Most Diesel Emissions in California
- Michigan Gov. Whitmer Proposes 45-Cent Gas Tax Hike in First Budget
- California Lawmakers Seek New Ways to Relieve High Rents
- New BRT Launching in Snohomish County, Washington
- APTA Calls for $232 Billion in 'Critical' Public Transit Investment
- Connecting the Issues of Flooding and Affordable Housing in Texas
- Lyft to Help Expand Bike Share Citywide in Chicago
- Chinese Cities Build Big Despite Shedding Residents
