The Newsom administration sent a letter warning Beverly Hills that their failure to process an application for a residential high-rise is a violation of state housing law

According to an LAist article, “California housing officials are sending a message to the city of Beverly Hills: approve plans for a high-rise apartment building, or we’ll see you in court.” Last week the California Department of Housing and Community Development sent a letter to Beverly Hills city council warning that their failure to process an application for a 165-unit apartment building along densely developed Wilshire Boulevard. In a statement, Gov. Newsom said, “[Beverly Hills’s] attempt to block this housing project violates the law. Now is a time to build more housing, not cave to the demands of NIMBYs.”
Beverly Hills officials say they have not yet denied the project and their actions so far have been “procedural in nature,” reports David Wagner for LAist. The city’s most recent action in June was to deny an appeal from the developer challenging the city’s conclusion that the project application was “incomplete.” Plans for the building were submitted in October 2022 under a provision known as “Builder’s Remedy,” which allows developers to propose eligible housing development projects that do not comply with either the zoning or the general plan in cities without a state-approved housing plans. As of January of this year, Beverly Hills was two years late in developing a housing plan compliant with state laws requiring the city to plan for 3,104 new units by 2029, more than half of which must be affordable to low-income households.
The HDC has given the city until September 20, 2024 to respond to its letter. If approved, the high-rise in question would be one of the city’s tallest residential buildings, with 20 percent of the apartments reserved for low-income renters and also contain a hotel.
FULL STORY: Newsom administration tells Beverly Hills its efforts to block a high-rise violate state housing law

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions