Pitting Washington, D.C.’s K Street Transitway against free transit oversimplifies a more complex issue.

A proposal to provide free transit service in lieu of a new multimodal transitway in Washington, D.C. sparked heated debate among transit advocates, but now the District’s transit users may not get either one, writes George Kevin Jordan in Streetsblog USA.
“In late April, two members of the D.C. Council grabbed headlines when they proposed scrapping the multimodal, $123-million K Street Transitway project — a long-fought road redesign which would prioritize bus service by featuring two separated bus lanes between 12th Street NW to 21st Street NW, among other multimodal improvements — and re-allocate its funding towards an initiative called Metro for D.C., allowing people to board a bus within District limits for free, no matter the final destination.”
Now, a request from Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) board Chair Paul Smedberg to delay the free transit program prompts questions as to whether any transit improvements will be made at all. Jordan points out that the service-vs.-free fares debate misses the point, pointing out that it isn’t a question of a simple tradeoff.
Rather, each initiative comes with its own set of challenges and associated opportunities: “Under the surface of the debate are budgetary concerns for both the city and the WMATA, design concerns about the Transitway that some say would undermine its multimodal goals,” while the legislation that would fund the free fares program would also increase transit service. For now, “With D.C.’s budget still to be voted on, the future of both K-Street and Metro for D.C. seem to be up in the air.”
FULL STORY: D.C.’s ‘Free Fares Vs. Good Service’ Debate Isn’t What You Think

In Most U.S. Cities, Archaic Laws Limit Roommate Living
Critics argue laws preventing unrelated adults from living in the same home fail to understand the modern American household.

Ten Signs of a Resurgent Downtown
In GeekWire, Chuck Wolfe continues his exploration of a holistic and practical approach to post-pandemic urban center recovery, anchored in local context and community-driven initiatives that promote livability, safety, and sustainability.

Transforming Downtowns Into Functional Neighborhoods
Rather than ‘monofunctional’ business districts or urban playgrounds, American downtown districts could become multipurpose neighborhoods.

Sound Transit Reveals Early 2024 Service Plans
Seattle’s transit agency is looking to maximize its limited resources as it continues to grapple with staffing shortages and supply chain issues across the region.

Micromobility Plus Transit Equals Jobs
Linking micromobility options to public transit can improve job acessibility, new research finds.

Enforcing Housing Discrimination Laws Falls Largely on Tenants, Nonprofits
With few enforcement mechanisms even in cities that have bans on source-of-income discrimination on the books, it’s up to nonprofit lawyers and tenants to sue landlords for retribution.
City of Orange
City of Charlotte - Charlotte Area Transit
City of Bellevue
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Montrose County
Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan Area Planning Department
City of Lomita
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.