Another fatal crash prompts questions about Elon Musk's autopilot claims.
A recent fatal crash outside of Houston highlights the dangers of relying on Tesla's Full Self-Driving Capability, the $10,000 feature that "includes Autopilot, a feature that 'automatically' drives on highways, changing lanes, keeping a car within its lane and at a consistent distance from other vehicles."
Despite the name, Tesla warns against using the features without proper supervision in company materials, writes Aarian Marshall in Wired. "Lengthy blocks of text in Tesla owners’ manuals describe when, where, and how the features should be used: by a fully attentive driver who is holding the steering wheel and is 'mindful of road conditions and surrounding traffic.' That driver shouldn’t be near city streets, construction zones, bicyclists, or pedestrians, the manual says."
The two men died "when their 2019 Model S reportedly slammed into a tree and caught fire," possibly with no driver at the wheel. "Harris County constable Mark Herman said that while local authorities’ preliminary investigation is not complete, they believe no one was behind the wheel of the vehicle when it crashed." The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board are both investigating the incident. "A spokesperson for NHTSA says the agency has opened investigations into 28 Tesla-related crash incidents."
Despite Tesla CEO Elon Musk's claim that "Autopilot's getting good enough that you won't need to drive most of the time unless you really want to" and his unfulfilled 2019 assertion that his company would operate one million robotaxis by the end of 2020, the company told the California Department of Motor Vehicles that "Full Self-Driving will 'remain largely unchanged in the future,' and that FSD will remain an 'advanced driver-assistance feature' rather than an autonomous one."
Indiana Once Again Considering Ban on Dedicated Transit Lanes
The proposed legislation would impact the construction of planned IndyGo Blue Line, the third phase of the city’s bus rapid transit system.
4 Ways to Use AI in Urban Planning and City Design
With the ability to predict trends, engage citizens, enhance resource allocation, and guide decision-making, artificial intelligence has the potential to serve as planners’ very own multi-tool.
LA’s ‘Spongy’ Infrastructure Captured Almost 9 Billion Gallons of Water
The city is turning away from stormwater management practices that shuttle water to the ocean, building infrastructure that collects and directs it underground instead.
An Affordable Housing Model for Indigenous Americans
Indigenous people make up a disproportionately high percentage of the unhoused population, but many programs designed to assist them don’t reach those most in need.
Oregon Bill Would Ban E-Bikes for Riders Under 16
State lawmakers seek to change Oregon e-bike laws following the death of a 15-year old last summer.
Northeastern Waterways More Polluted After Wet Year
Intense rains washed more runoff into local bodies of water, while warmer temperatures contributed to the growth of an invasive bloom.
Tufts University Department of Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning
City of Grand Forks, North Dakota
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
City of Birmingham, Alabama
City of Laramie, Wyoming
Colorado Department of Local Affairs
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.