A tax break approved by the Texas Legislature is delivering massive benefits to developers in the state, but advocates say the public isn't getting the promised return on investment.

Eric Dexheimer shares news of new analysis from researchers at the University of Texas School of Law about the effect of a 2015 tax break approved, ostensibly, for affordable housing projects in Texas. The tax break was approved in a last minute amendment "onto a densely worded bill updating finance statutes" by Republican State Senator Craig Estes and promised to deliver a financial boost to affordable housing developers.
"Since then, the one-sentence amendment has resulted in private developers receiving tens of millions of dollars in property tax breaks. It has saved them millions more in tax-free construction costs — all with scant benefit to the public," explains Dexheimer of the findings of the study released earlier this week.
In response to the quick popularity of the tax break for projects around the state, estimated by the report to deliver annual property tax breaks to apartment developers of close to $1 million per property on average, advocates are pressing back on the idea that the project is delivering promised low-income housing.
[T]hanks in part to a series of loopholes buried in the paperwork, the so-called affordable housing created in exchange for the 2015 tax breaks often is as expensive as market-rate apartments, said Heather Way, a professor at the Austin law school and lead author of the study. “The public’s just not getting the return on its investment,” she said.
John Henneberger, co-director of the Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service, is quoted in the article raising the stakes on Way's statement. Henneberger says the tax break is a misuse of taxpayer funds.
FULL STORY: How a big Texas tax break created not-so-affordable housing

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)