The Pew Research Center digs into a question of definitions, fraught with exceptions and subjectivity.

Ruth Igielnik Wieder shares the results of a survey and analysis intended to determine more about the defining characteristics of urban, suburban, and rural communities in the United States.
As a new approach to the question of how to tell these types of communities apart, the team at the Pew Research Center took the additional step of surveying residents to compare public perception to outside sources of classification, two from the government and one based on ZIP codes. The government sources included 1) the National Center for Health Studies Urban-Rural Classification Scheme and 2) the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service’s Rural-Urban Continuum County Classification. The ZIP Code measure included two factors: "the distance from the ZIP code to the center of the largest principal city in the nearest metro area (as measured by distance to the city hall) and the household density in the ZIP code."
According to Wilder, the comparisons between those three measures and the findings of the survey reveal a few patterns: "All three methods most accurately classified rural Americans and did less well with Americans in urban and suburban areas. And while all the measures performed relatively well overall, the decision tree most closely matched self-reports across all three community types."
As for which metric turned out to be the most useful, in the opinion of researchers: the self-reported assessment.
FULL STORY: Evaluating what makes a U.S. community urban, suburban or rural

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.

In These Cities, Most New Housing is Under 441 Square Feet
With loosened restrictions on “micro-housing,” tiny units now make up as much as 66% of newly constructed housing.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)