Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Education

Housing Policy Preemption for Red States

While statewide efforts to loosen zoning restrictions have made news in (mostly) blue states like California and Oregon, (mostly) red states like Florida have been preventing local governments from passing their own housing policies.
July 26, 2019, 10am PDT | James Brasuell | @CasualBrasuell
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments
Texas Capitol Building
The Texas State Legislature has been very effective at blocking progressive affordable housing policies on the local level.

Sophie Kasakove reports on the flip side of the state preemption coin—red states blocking local government from approving new housing policies.

California and Oregon have made national news for several years with their efforts to upzone around transit stations and end single-family zoning, respectively. California still hasn't approved statewide legislation, after both SB 827 and SB 50 failed. Oregon, however, succeeded in approving House Bill 2001. Oregon also implemented statewide rent control.

Less well known, however, is the fate of an upzoning and inclusionary zoning ordinance approved in Miami in December 2018. "At the end of June, Florida's governor approved a law banning municipalities from passing mandatory inclusionary zoning ordinances, sending Miami's city councilors back to the drawing board," according to Kasakove.

That's just the latest example of states shutting down the ability of local governments to approve affordable housing toolkits, writes Kasakove. "In total, at least 35 states currently enforce some limitation on cities' ability to protect or create affordable housing, whether by preventing them from enacting rent control and anti-discrimination measures, mandating inclusionary zoning, regulating short-term rentals, or some combination of these measures."

In fact, Republican-controlled state legislatures have been very effective in approving preemption laws on a number of subjects, not just housing development: "In the past decade, especially following the Republican Party's 2010 electoral takeover of state houses, preemption legislation has become an increasingly common method for conservatives to secure control over a range of issues of concern, from minimum wage laws to plastic bag bans."

Back to housing policy, as preemption in conservative states has expanded beyond its roots in the anti-rent control politics of the 1970s. "As of 2017, at least 11 states had adopted laws that prevent localities from enacting mandatory inclusionary zoning or limit their ability to develop voluntary inclusionary zoning policies. Last year, Wisconsin joined the list and Tennessee made its ban even more stringent; similar legislation was under consideration in Hawaii and Louisiana, where it has so far stalled."

States are also preempting cites on regulations of short-term rentals. Texas also preempted cities by prohibiting laws that prevent source of income discrimination. "A proposed bill that was ultimately put on hold in Arizona's most recent legislative session would have prevented municipalities from enforcing any new rules governing landlords," writes Kasakove.

The article includes more context and insight into the ethical and moral quandaries of the local control versus state preemption debate currently driving housing policy.

Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, July 23, 2019 in Pacific Standard
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email