Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Education

The Case for Wildlife Crossings

If wildlife crossings seem to expensive to build with so many infrastructure needs around the country, consider the cost of not building safe passage for animals.
April 20, 2019, 9am PDT | James Brasuell | @CasualBrasuell
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments
 Trans-Canada Highway in Banff National Park
EB Adventure Photography

Motorists kill an estimated one to two million large animals every year in the United States. Starre Vartan writes about a remarkably successful method for preventing those deaths: wildlife under- and overpasses.

"Studies that looked at a cross-section of native species' deaths on highways in Floridabandicoots and wallabies in Australia, and jaguars in Mexico, just to name a few, all show that wildlife crossings save money and lives, both human and animal," according to Vartan.

Yes, humans die, about 200 every year, when they drive their cars into large animals. And all of these collisions are expensive. "Deer-car collisions cost an average of $8,190, an elk-vehicle collision is about $25,319, and a moose-vehicle collision is $44,546, taking into consideration human injuries and death, towing, vehicle repair, investigation of the accident by local authorities, and carcass disposal, according to a paper from the Western Transportation Institute (WTI) at Montana State University."

Vartan highlights one project in Washington State in particular as an example of how the idea of wildlife overpasses are catching on. The news coverage of the story includes lot of on-scene photography by National Geographic photographer Joe Riis. 

Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, April 16, 2019 in National Geographic
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email