Deland Chan, a lecturer in the Urban Studies program at Stanford University and co-founder of the Stanford Human Cities Initiative, makes the case for a bigger tent for planners and planning.
An article by Deland Chan suggests a new definition for the concept of "real planning" to ensure that women get more credit for the contributions to citymaking of the past, and that underrepresented groups have more of a role in the planning of the future.
For instance, Chan cites the work of "women-organized clubs that led the charge for urban beautification at the turn of the 20th century. " Plans like Charles Mulford Robinson’s General Plan for the Improvement of Colorado Springs (1912) erased the contributions of these clubs, in a familiar narrative about men consolidating and protecting their role in the making of history.
That example is a symptom of a larger problem, according to Chan—that the "planning canon, as it currently exists, reinforces a binary notion of what 'real' planning is and isn’t." While the ambitious plans, backed by institutional political and financing clout get credit, "planning from below, and 'soft,' people-centered work like community outreach, are not ascribed the same kind of value." Chan adds:
If we expanded the definition of planning, we might include Majora Carter’s workforce development and environmental justice work in the South Bronx, or Antionette Carroll’s Creative Reaction Lab, which tackles inequity in St. Louis. Carter, Carroll, and many other women leaders are not “real” (i.e. professionally trained and certified) planners, but they have shaped their cities and amplified place-based work already happening in low-income communities of color.
Finally, Chan puts out a call to action to the academic programs around the country to take a leadership role in redefining the scope of what's considered real planning:
To start, colleges and universities that make up the pipeline of future planners should rethink what they teach. It is time to recognize that our shared identity as planners is based on privileging the contributions of certain individuals and groups over others. In specific terms, institutions can reshape curricula to include missing or marginalized voices.
Read the full story: What Counts as 'Real' City Planning?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing
The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.
Nation's most wind-powered state turns to coal as data centers increase energy demand
For the first time in decades, Iowa has increased its generation of coal power.
NYC cools commuters with city's first rain garden above a bus stop
New York City officials say the plants in the rain garden can absorb 16 gallons of rainwater during heavy storms.
Brightline West’s future may rely on $6 billion federal loan
The company has until Nov. 2 to make a $400 million equity investment into its proposed high-speed rail line.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Greater Baltimore Committee
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association