Philadelphia's controversial "Mixed-Income Housing Program" legislation has run into stiff resistance from developers and builders.

The city of Philadelphia has hit a roadblock in an attempt to approve a new inclusionary zoning ordinance.
The latest development in the unfolding saga occurred on Monday, when the City Council's Rules Committee postponed a vote on the bill by Councilmember Maria Quiñones-Sánchez until December 5. Jake Blumgart reports that the postponement came after five hours of testimony, with criticism about the bill originating from the development and building industries.
The postponement follows news from last week, also reported by Blumgart, which saw amendments "radically reshape" the bill. Also last week, "[t]he Planning Commission decided the bill needed more work and voted to place a hold on it," reports Blumgart.
Here's how Blumgart describes the changes between the original bill and the bill after the amendments made last week:
The original bill would have required any new development in Philadelphia larger than nine residential units to set aside 10 percent of the units as affordable units. Although a percentage of them could be covered by a payment into the city’s Housing Trust Fund or offered off site, some of the units had to be interspersed throughout the building. That’s why the legislation is described as a “Mixed-Income Housing Program.”
The amendments Sanchez is now offering would change all that. Developers are now allowed to opt out of on-site development completely in exchange for paying into the trust fund. The bill originally would have covered the entire city, offering different affordability limits in Center City and the rest of town. But now the bill only applies to high-density zoning districts (RM-4, RMX-3, CMX-3, CMX-4, and CMX-5), which are concentrated in Center City, University City, and along a few major thoroughfares in other neighborhoods.
After the City Council's Rule Committee hearing earlier this week, Councilmember Maria Quiñones-Sánchez is quoted saying that there isn't any new information that is likely to change the position of any interested participants in the debate.
FULL STORY: Hold the zone: Vote on inclusionary zoning delayed a week in wake of opposition

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.

‘Quality Work, Fast’: NC Gears up for Homebuilding After Helene, Trying to Avoid Past Pitfalls
The state will field bids to demolish, repair and rebuild homes in the mountains. After struggles in eastern NC, officials aim to chart a different course.

Washington State’s Parking Reform Law Could Unlock ‘Countless’ Acres for New Housing
A law that limits how much parking cities can require for residential amd commercial developments could lead to a construction boom.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions