Some state constitutions provide that citizens have the right to a healthy environment. But these seemingly innocuous provisions may lead to counterproductive results.

Numerous state constitutions include “environmental rights amendments” (ERAs) creating a public right to a clean environment. For example, New York’s amendment, enacted in 2021, provides that “[e]ach person shall have the right to clean air and water, and a healthful environment.”
At first glance, these provisions seem quite innocuous. Who could be against a “healthful environment?” However, the vagueness of this provision gives judges virtually unlimited powers of interpretation, and litigants virtually unlimited power to attack projects with lawsuits. As a result, ERAs can easily be manipulated to support some not-very-healthful results.
For example, suppose a city rezones to allow more housing in job centers served by excellent public transit. Obviously, this is an environmentally friendly policy; residents of transit-filled job centers such as New York City’s financial district are far more likely to use public transit or walk to work than residents of car-dependent suburbs.
Yet anti-development activists are already using the ERA as a tool to keep housing out of walkable areas. In response to a proposal to build new housing in New York’s Lower East Side (a neighborhood with a Walkscore of 96, less than two miles from the city’s Financial District) a group of project opponents have announced plans to file a lawsuit under New York’s ERA. The litigants claim that construction of new housing “exacerbates respiratory, cardiovascular, and mental health issues” in their community.
At first glance, this lawsuit seems implausible. Even if construction of housing in the Lower East Side would create noise or pollution, the same is true of construction anywhere in a city, or even in an inner-ring suburb next to existing housing or offices or stores. So if courts outlawed construction near existing development, development could only occur in the most remote, car-dependent suburbs, rather than in places near existing housing or jobs. So if the Lower East Side ERA suit succeeded, courts would essentially be mandating car-dependent suburban sprawl and forbidding all other construction- hardly a pro-environmental result.
One might argue that because this lawsuit is unlikely to succeed, the ERA is harmless. But even unsuccessful lawsuits (or the threat of one) can delay development. The experience of state environmental review statutes is relevant. Many states (such as New York) have laws requiring environmental impact statements for any activity that requires a government permit (such as a rezoning or a bike lane) that creates a significant environmental impact. These laws, unlike the ERA, do not directly prohibit controversial activity. Nevertheless, they are similar to an ERA in that they require courts to opine on what activities create environmental impacts. Opponents of buildings can use these laws to delay projects in a variety of ways—first by trying to stop a project until an environmental impact statement is filed, and then by challenging the statement as inadequate once it has been filed. If environmental review statutes can be misused to support sprawl and fight infill, so can ERAs.

San Diego to Rescind Multi-Unit ADU Rule
The city wants to close a loophole that allowed developers to build apartment buildings on single-family lots as ADUs.

Has President Trump Met His Match?
Doug Ford, the no-nonsense premier of Canada's most populous province, Ontario, is taking on Trump where it hurts — making American energy more expensive.

Study: London ULEZ Rapidly Cleaning up Air Pollution
Expanding the city’s ultra low-emission zone has resulted in dramatic drops in particle emissions in inner and outer London.

Expanding Green Spaces in Greater LA: Challenges and Solutions
Creating parks and open space in L.A. County requires overcoming land scarcity, high costs, and other challenges through strategic partnerships, innovative multi-benefit designs, and policy reforms to ensure equitable access and sustainability.

Embracing Spring: Ways to Reconnect With Nature and Find Joy
This spring, reconnect with nature and enhance your well-being through simple activities like observing plants up close, practicing forest bathing, birdwatching, arranging flowers, and starting a container garden.

The Unseen Aftermath: Wildfires’ Lasting Health and Emotional Burden
Wildfires in Los Angeles not only pose immediate physical health risks but also lead to long-term respiratory problems and mental health struggles, underscoring the need for a coordinated public health response to mitigate their lasting effects.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Resource Assistance for Rural Environments
City of Edmonds
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
City of Piedmont, CA
Great Falls Development Authority, Inc.
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
