Using the movie titled "When Worlds Collide" as a metaphor, environmental attorney Richard Opper describes how environmental regulations can get in their own way to defeat density and infill development—and NIMBYs are not just residents.
In San Diego, a legacy (grandfathered) industrial use fought against a downtown residential project because of fear that the new residents would use air quality regulations to limit the operations of their plant. No one contended that there was a real air quality issue. Rather, the plant owner was concerned that the future residents would use the regulations to harass them. This worry was enough to generate the plant owner's opposition. Ironically, this was the stereotypical case of NIMBY residents taken one level deeper. A NIMBY business motivated by fear of future NIMBY residents. The project was "saved" by substituting a hotel for the residential project. However, the goals of a better environment and better air quality through density and transit friendly development were defeated. Richard Opper, a San Diego environmental attorney specializing in brownfield development, writes about how environmental regulations are often used to defeat their own overriding objectives:
One policy of our Californian laws is designed to encourage infill – perhaps best exemplified by Government Code, section 65041.1 (…”to protect environmental…resources…and promote…efficient development….”) but that policy sometimes runs headlong into another set of our laws – those that regulate air quality. We want people to build near mass transit stations, we even have a name for it – Transit Oriented Development – but in doing so we create potential for conflict between the new residents and the transit (or other urban activity) they came to be near. Our laws on air regulation include a broad and powerful section – not unlike the California Civil Code – regulating “nuisance.” Our Health & Safety Code, section 41700, relates a wide swath of circumstances that can lead to action by our regional air resources boards. “Annoyance” by a number of people gets it going.
For more details, and Richard Opper's acerbic wit, please see source article.
FULL STORY: When Worlds Collide (air quality) – Observations from the Brownfield Trenches

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions