The 2020 Census is fast approaching, and this week the Census Bureau crossed a major item of its to-do list in preparation for the next census by presenting its list proposed questions to Congress.
The U.S. Census released a new publication this week: the eagerly anticipated "Subjects Planned for the 2020 Census and American Community Survey" [pdf] report. By releasing the proposed subjects for the upcoming census, the Census Bureau is conforming to mandate in the Census Act that it submit the subjects to be included in the next census to Congress no later than three years before the census date.
The publication concludes a comprehensive review process by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and the Census Bureau, including chartering the Interagency Council on Statistical Policy (ICSP) Subcommittee on the American Community Survey (ACS) and conducting the 2014 ACS Content Review.
In the report itself, the Census Bureau explains more of the questions asked during the review process, such as questions of necessity, openness, respectful treatment of respondents, and confidentiality. The document also serves to justify many of the proposed subjects, by specifically citing the agencies that will use the data generated by the Census survey.
Since the new planned subjects for the census was released, controversy has erupted over the omission of questions regarding LGBT categories. According to an article Chris Johnson, some questions regarding sexual orientation and gender identity were removed on the day of the report's release. Although Johnson shows a side-by-side comparison to the report, before and after the change, we cannot find a record of the reported statement from the Census Bureau saying it erred in including these questions. Glenn Garner reports the lack of gender and sexuality questions on the planned subjects document differently, saying that the U.S. Census had ignored the urging of some federal agencies to include such questions. We'll update this story if we find more to confirm either version of these stories. [Update: Ben Casselman has reported with more details on the omission of the LGBTQ questions and ongoing questions about the Trump Administration's role in the 11th hour changes to the planned subjects.]
Back in February, Chris Williamson wrote more on the benchmarks and important release dates that planners should be watching for on the approach to Census 2020.
Read the full story: Subjects Planned for the 2020 Census and American Community Survey
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority