The Architect's Newspaper reports on the potentially outsized implications of a recent decision by the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission.
"One downtown preservation group claims that New York has reached the 'end of the landmarks approval process' with one crucial decision this week," according to an article by Audrey Wachs.
"At Tuesday’s Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC), the commission voted 8–2 to approve a building plan on Gansevoort Street between Greenwich and Washington streets. Some neighborhood activists, though, are not happy about the plan," adds Wachs to describe the specific circumstances leading to the outcry.
The article includes details about the proposed plan that upset local preservationists. Developer William Gottlieb Real Estate and Aurora Capital has proposed a plan to modify 60-68 Gansevoort and 70-74 Gansevoort—"two market buildings that date from the late 19th century (but have been modified substantially over time) and are some of the last vestiges of this type of commercial architecture in New York."
The organization Save Gansevort takes exception with the approval of the proposal by the LPC. In a statement following the ruling, Saving Gansevort used strong words to describe the implications of the decision, calling it "the latest sign that unrestricted development is killing the unique character of so many of our city’s most beautiful neighborhoods" and "disconcerting that even our landmarked areas are no longer protected."
Wachs also reports on a city bill also approved this week that expedites the LPC's landmarks approval process. Properties taking to long to move to a vote can now be removed from consideration.
FULL STORY: Is this the end of New York City’s landmarks approval process as we know it?

Florida Considers Legalizing ADUs
Current state law allows — but doesn’t require — cities to permit accessory dwelling units in single-family residential neighborhoods.

HUD Announces Plan to Build Housing on Public Lands
The agency will identify federally owned parcels appropriate for housing development and streamline the regulatory process to lease or transfer land to housing authorities and nonprofit developers.

Conservatives’ Decongestion Pricing Flip-Flop
When it comes to solving traffic problems, the current federal administration is on track for failure, waste, and hypocrisy.

Research Shows More Roads = More Driving
A national study shows, once again, that increasing road supply induces additional vehicle travel, particularly over the long run.

Can Progressive Planners Appeal to Conservative Principles?
Trump’s approach to policies like NYC’s congestion pricing isn’t just irrational and wasteful — it defies the tenets of conservatism. But there are ways to reframe the issues.

Oak Park Plans Earth Month Events
Join Oak Park, Illinois, for a series of Earth Month events highlighting the importance of community engagement and education, integrating sustainability into local plans, and planning for the most vulnerable, such as birds, bees and butterflies.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Florida Atlantic University
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies
City of Piedmont, CA
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
City of Cambridge, Maryland