When Congress recently failed yet again to pass a long-term surface transportation bill, Representative Earl Blumenauer decided it was time for a reality check.
Congress is doing damage, Blumenauer says, because short-term fixes just create "fits and starts": "You don’t get the big multistate, multimodal, multiyear projects because you simply cannot plan them. You are not getting the benefits of harnessing the power of this investment for the overall economy."
Fighting in Congress has forced infrastructure projects into those fits and starts for decades, with sometimes disastrous results. But it wasn't always this way.
Until the '90s, both parties had cooperated to fund surface transportation since the federal government created the National Interstate and Defense Highways program in 1956—usually by increasing the gas tax. Even President Reagan got Congress to raise the gas tax by 125 percent in 1982.
Blumenauer says increasingly anti-tax and -government views among Republicans in Congress have helped polarize the issue. But, he points out, many Republicans are happy to fund surface transportation at the state and local level.
This year alone, six Republican states voted to do so by increasing the gas tax—the "simple" solution Blumenauer has advocated for at the federal level for years. Advocates say updating the gas tax is a simple way to generate consistent revenue, especially since it hasn’t been adjusted for inflation since the last full transportation bill was passed in the '90s.
In The Planning Report, Blumenauer details the essential elements of a fully funded surface transportation bill: public-private partnerships, tolls, and road-user charges accompanying the gas tax increase. And he's optimistic that when Congress comes back into session, they’ll have no choice but to work it out:
"The good news is that more momentum is building at the state and local level. The coalition is broad and growing, and we’re running out of alternatives. We’re looking at an America that used to have the finest infrastructure in the world when we started in this business. Sadly, that is no longer the case. I’m hopeful that work at the state and local level will help prompt people to step up and take action."
Read the full story: A Reality Check: Do Too Many Republicans Want to Defund Federal Surface Transportation Investment?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority