As cities strive to improve the "design" and "beauty" of their buildings, how can such attributes be mandated by planning documents if their mere mention is verboten, asks Karrie Jacobs.
Jacobs looks to New York City's recently released East Midtown Study, which provides recommendations for upzoning the blocks surrounding Grand Central Terminal to produce the city's next generation of distinct towers, for a parable about the quest to remove subjective judgements of design or beauty from the planning process, in favor of objective evaluations of quality.
Jacobs is encouraged by an initial draft of the Study that included language in support of "extraordinary buildings" and "superior design," which leads her to ponder whether, "[i]n a city where the developer has always been the most powerful shaper
of built form, could city government finally be tipping the balance
toward the architect?"
In the final document, however, any mention of "design" is notoriously absent. When Jacobs questions planning director Amanda Burden about the omission, she responds: "It really can't be subjective according to somebody's
taste or whim. This is too important to the city's future,
too important to the skyline." In place of trying to judge the nebulous concept of "beauty" or "superior design", Burden contends that distinct elements such as a building's contribution to the pedestrian realm or its relationship with neighboring buildings can be measured objectively.
"At the same time she denies that the word 'design' has a place in the
East Midtown Study, Burden says that the proposed zoning is intended to
incentivize 'great new iconic structures.' But you can't achieve icon
status by adhering to a checklist," argues Jacobs. "Generally, what you get is a tall,
fat building with a novel spire on top and a spiffy subway entrance at
the base. I thought introducing a squishy, qualitative notion like 'superior design' was a good idea, quixotic for sure, but also kind of
brilliant. I had hoped-naively, as it turns out-that the city was
emitting a signal (like a dog whistle that could be heard only by
architects), saying there was room for genius in its plans."
Read the full story: Uttering the D-Word
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Move over, LA: St. Louis gears up for Olympics, invests millions in downtown redevelopment
The Missouri city will host the 2028 Olympic soccer group stage and knockout matches.
Mass. votes against statewide minimum lot size for single-family homes
Over 2 million residents voted on Question 7; it was decided by just over 30,000 votes.
Maryland’s $15 billion bridge project gains key approval
The Maryland Transit Authority said the project will create over 60,000 jobs and add $23 billion to the local economy.
‘No clear next steps’ for Chicago's permanent festival grounds
Eleventh Ward Ald. Nicole Lee has suggested Soldier Field as a possible location for the permanent event space.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority