As cities strive to improve the "design" and "beauty" of their buildings, how can such attributes be mandated by planning documents if their mere mention is verboten, asks Karrie Jacobs.
Jacobs looks to New York City's recently released East Midtown Study, which provides recommendations for upzoning the blocks surrounding Grand Central Terminal to produce the city's next generation of distinct towers, for a parable about the quest to remove subjective judgements of design or beauty from the planning process, in favor of objective evaluations of quality.
Jacobs is encouraged by an initial draft of the Study that included language in support of "extraordinary buildings" and "superior design," which leads her to ponder whether, "[i]n a city where the developer has always been the most powerful shaper
of built form, could city government finally be tipping the balance
toward the architect?"
In the final document, however, any mention of "design" is notoriously absent. When Jacobs questions planning director Amanda Burden about the omission, she responds: "It really can't be subjective according to somebody's
taste or whim. This is too important to the city's future,
too important to the skyline." In place of trying to judge the nebulous concept of "beauty" or "superior design", Burden contends that distinct elements such as a building's contribution to the pedestrian realm or its relationship with neighboring buildings can be measured objectively.
"At the same time she denies that the word 'design' has a place in the
East Midtown Study, Burden says that the proposed zoning is intended to
incentivize 'great new iconic structures.' But you can't achieve icon
status by adhering to a checklist," argues Jacobs. "Generally, what you get is a tall,
fat building with a novel spire on top and a spiffy subway entrance at
the base. I thought introducing a squishy, qualitative notion like 'superior design' was a good idea, quixotic for sure, but also kind of
brilliant. I had hoped-naively, as it turns out-that the city was
emitting a signal (like a dog whistle that could be heard only by
architects), saying there was room for genius in its plans."
FULL STORY: Uttering the D-Word

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)