Amanda Hurley explores the gender imbalance present among women in architecture and the "male-dominated world" of development, and questions the societal and biological justifications that many argue are determinants for choosing professional roles.
In terms of gender balance, architecture and development have not caught up to other professions like law and medicine. Though nearly half of the architecture student body in the country is female, "just 17 percent are firm principals and partners, according to a 2012 AIA survey of 2,805 member firms. For some reason, while they're ascending the architectural career ladder, thousands of women hit a glass ceiling, leave the profession, or get pushed out." The development field isn't much better, as "just 30 percent of all development professionals are women."
This striking imbalance, writes Hurley, may exist for numerous reasons. One of those reasons, she claims, is that women are making a conscious effort to affirm autonomy in their professions, thereby steering clear of male-dominated firms and agencies, which make up the bulk of the development field. But in doing so, claims architect Audrey Matlock, "[women] may be inadvertently making it more difficult for themselves to gain the experience they need for developer projects."
A biological argument puts women at a greater advantage over men, writes Hurley. Developer Romy Goldman argues that, "Women, because of the attention they tend to give to details that make a place more livable, can make a qualitative difference on a project." But Hurley, contends it may not be as much about your biology, but whether or not your personality is a match for the tasks ahead. "[You're] on a jobsite with all men; it's dirty; you're not dealing with a formal environment. You have to be very comfortable with risk and the unknown, because that's what it is on a daily basis."
FULL STORY: Would there be more women in architecture if there were more women in development?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.

The Tiny, Adorable $7,000 Car Turning Japan Onto EVs
The single seat Mibot charges from a regular plug as quickly as an iPad, and is about half the price of an average EV.

Seattle's Plan for Adopting Driverless Cars
Equity, safety, accessibility and affordability are front of mind as the city prepares for robotaxis and other autonomous vehicles.

As Trump Phases Out FEMA, Is It Time to Flee the Floodplains?
With less federal funding available for disaster relief efforts, the need to relocate at-risk communities is more urgent than ever.

With Protected Lanes, 460% More People Commute by Bike
For those needing more ammo, more data proving what we already knew is here.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)