California Should Alter Its HSR Plans to Save Money
Thomas Elias argues that California's HSR plans should be altered to reduce costs and avoid some urban municipalities against the plans. This would reduce the $25 billion funding gap and allow construction to move ahead.
Elias thinks "anyone who thinks building a 238-mph rail system between San Diego and San Francisco will come in at or under budget is probably hallucinating." Instead, California should construct as much HSR track as it can while keeping costs low and then running the trains through urban areas like Orange County and the South Bay at slower speeds on existing track. He believes that total journey times will only be increased by around 45 minutes, but California could replace these inner city portions of the route at a later date.
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, June 29, 2010 in
Topics
- Every Parking Lot, Visualized
- Millennials Prefer Revitalized Historic Areas, Not Malls
- How Planners Can Liberate the Next Amazon
- Coffee With Your Gentrification?
- An Interactive Map of the World's Climate in 2100
- To Learn About a City, Visit Its Neighborhoods
- Friday Funny: Infrastructure Woes Cause National Case of Insomnia
- Lawrence Halprin and the Public Realm: Can the United Nations Plaza Unite San Franciscans?
- Like City, Like Stadium
- Could Baby Boomers Make Room for Millennials?
- Pittsburgh Takes Property Data Visualization to the Next Level
- Education and Nutrition Flourish Together
- How Long Will the Office of Environmental Justice Last in Trump's EPA?
- Critiquing Santa Monica's 'Grand Bargain' of a Downtown Plan
- Marine Sanctuaries Not Safe From Drilling
- Court Decision Forces Seattle to Improve Sidewalk Infrastructure
- No More Parking Minimums in Mexico City
- Philadelphia to Consider Bus System Redesign
- In a Perfect World, Maintenance Is the Coolest Trend in Infrastructure
- A Boring Lesson for Planners
