Anti-Hasidism or Preservation?
Chabad Lubavitch of Connecticut has filed suit against the Historic District Commission for denying its application to develop a property there into a center. The Commission said it would consider a revised plan, but Chabad says it's anti-Hasidism.
"The plaintiffs [Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield, CT] claim in the suit... that the actions of the defendants [the Historic District Commission] in blocking Chabad's plans represent violations of the Jewish group's civil rights, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) and Connecticut statutes."
"The commission's motion for denial stated that the proposal would overwhelm the town's central historic district. A written statement from Mr. Stedronsky said the plan would have 'dwarfed the house, altered the streetscape and been incompatible with standards of the historic district.'"
Full Story:
Published on Thursday, September 10, 2009 in
- Poll: Who Are the Most Influential Urbanists?
- Housing Construction in Seattle and Vancouver a Study in Contrasts
- Friday Eye Candy: An Infographic for Every Transit Mode
- Why Replace Successful BRT With Rail?
- Search the Location of the Nearest Confederate Monument
- Cooling L.A.
- The Archaeology of Public Memory and Civic Identity
- Night Mayors Come to America
- Is the Era of the 'Free' Freeway Coming to an End?
- What Will Become of London's Transit Megaproject After Brexit?
- Southern California City Halts All Mixed-Use Construction
- Underwater Parking Garages: Why Not, Boston?
- Recommended Listening: Podcasts for Designers and Planners
- Congestion Pricing Could Be Fairer Than the Status Quo
- Metrorail Travel Patterns Revealed
- Free Falling: Productivity of U.S. Construction Industry Half of 1960s Level
- California to Consider 12 New Water Storage Facilities
- Praise for Gov. Andrew Cuomo from New York Times on Cordon Pricing
- Cracking Found in Frame of Philadelphia's Comcast Technology Center Tower
- U.S. DOT Brings Maryland Purple Line Back From the Dead
