Residents say the state's smart growth policies have done little to reign in sprawl, though questions remain about what action to take.
"Most Marylanders believe that development and growth are occurring too rapidly and are affecting their communities negatively, according to a poll released yesterday.
The telephone poll, a random sample of 1,000 registered voters surveyed by 1000 Friends of Maryland, an anti-sprawl group, found that most respondents want the state to take a stronger role in coordinating and steering growth to existing communities."
"Asked about the pace of growth and development in their communities, 53 percent said it was too fast, 37 percent said it was about right, and 8 percent said it was too slow.
Most respondents agreed that the public does not have enough control over local plans for growth and that many of the state's problems are a direct result of growth and development. More than two-thirds disagreed with the notion that Maryland has enough open space and that further protections are unnecessary.
Leslie Knapp, associate director of the Maryland Association of Counties, said the pollsters evidently failed to pose some crucial follow-up questions. He gave as an example the issue of people's desire to have the state steer growth to existing communities.
"The problem then becomes that you have to deal with the NIMBY factor - not in my back yard," said Knapp, whose organization lobbies on legislative and policy issues for the state's 23 counties and the city of Baltimore. "When you try to concentrate growth, you get significant citizen resistance. You'd need to ask people what amount of new development would you be willing to accept to keep it out of more rural areas."
In a similar vein, he referred to the apparently wide support for mass transit. "But if you put together a good system - one that encourages people to use it, that's convenient and efficient - it costs a lot of money, and there's a limit to what people will pay," said Knapp."
Read the full story: Sprawl too much, too fast, poll finds
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Democrats’ victory may threaten act to expedite energy projects
Democrats may decide to vote against the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, and negotiate a more favorable bill once the 120th Congress begins.
Voters choose public transit, approve $31 billion in funding
Approved projects include $101,000 for reduced-cost transit in a Michigan town and $14 billion for regional transit in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Study reveals best places in the U.S. for cycling, walking
New research from Streetlight Data examines bicycle and pedestrian miles per capita in the 100 largest U.S. cities by population.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority