As with Oregon's Measure 37, a property-rights group sponsored a measure to compensate land owners for losses resulting from county land use decisions. Though defeated, a similar measure, "Protect our Homes", will appear on the November state ballot.
Measure A, the Fair Pay for Public Benefit Act, sponsored by the Napa Valley Land Stewards Alliance, received only 38% of the vote at press time.
A broad coalition of diverse groups, including environmentalists Greenbelt Alliance and Sierra Club, agricultural groups such as the Napa Valley Vintners Association and the Farm Bureau, and chambers of commerce, all claimed that the initiative "would have wrecked havoc on local land-use planning and produced a tidal wave of litigation that could drain funds from other programs."
Proponents claimed that the "county supervisors could avoid paying for the economic impact of a new ordinance or regulation either by getting the approval of voters, or by exempting property owners from new rules."
Mike Rodrigues, vice president of the Land Stewards Alliance, which had the support of the Napa County Republican Party, "said he would turn his attention to the statewide Protect Our Homes Initiative, which is expected to be on the November ballot. It would similarly require state and local agencies to pay land owners when new regulations reduce property values. Critics say the initiative would cripple land-use planning and efforts to protect the environment."
"The statewide initiative would also prohibit the use of eminent domain to transfer property from one private entity to another, as is now allowed."
Read the full story: Property-rights measure losing by wide margin
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania hope to finally advance climate goals post-midterms
The three states have spent years under Republican or divided control.
Democrats’ victory may threaten act to expedite energy projects
Democrats may decide to vote against the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, and negotiate a more favorable bill once the 120th Congress begins.
Voters choose public transit, approve $31 billion in funding
Approved projects include $101,000 for reduced-cost transit in a Michigan town and $14 billion for regional transit in the San Francisco Bay Area.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority