Are Small Schools Better Than 'Sprawl Schools'?
Smaller, "walkable" neighborhood schools are an important part of the smart-growth puzzle, but they are not a panacea for school and community problems.
A convergence of factors is leading advocates in many fields toward the smaller neighborhood school. Critics of "sprawl schools" point out the negative effect on traffic and kids' health of building schools on the fringe of towns, and that these schools "act as a magnet for new growth, drawing people and resources away from existing schools and neighborhoods." And "there is mounting evidence that the impersonal environment of the mega-school inhibits the basic function of the school; that is, giving kids the best education possible."
Thanks to Joe Molinaro
Full Story:
Published on Monday, December 6, 2004 in
Topics
- Recycling Is Cancelled
- Seattle Gives Final Approval to 27 Upzones
- The Case for Fourplexes in Portland
- Pop Quiz: Can You Identify Cities By Density Alone?
- Chinese Cities Build Big Despite Shedding Residents
- Santa Monica Pedestrian Mall Wants People to Hang Out
- Scrutiny for HUD Secretary Ben Carson's Schedule
- Where a Freeway Plan Failed, a Development Opportunity Rises
- Reducing Motor Vehicle Traffic in Cities
- Jeep Plant Isn't Getting a Warm Reception From Detroit Residents
- When Traffic Solutions Cause Travel Delays
- The Many Ongoing Public Transportation Projects of the Bay Area
- On-Demand Shuttle Pilot Operating in Los Angeles
- Obama Presidential Center Still Facing Controversies
- Congress Intends to Ban Chinese Rail Cars
- Study: Housing Crisis Stems from Inequality (Not Zoning)
- Phoenix City Council Shifts Voter-Approved Light Rail Project Funding to Roads
- New Additions Coming to the Detroit Skyline
- Asking for Forgiveness
- The Fascinating Transformation of Suburban Architecture
