Weeks after federal officials evicted unhoused people from a Washington, D.C. park, research indicates that similar actions, which usually come at a high cost to cities, have little impact on homelessness in the long term.
A report from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) finds that ‘sweeps’ of homeless encampments, in which officials displace residents from established encampments, are “expensive and often of limited long-term effectiveness,” despite their popularity with many local politicians responding to pressure from community groups. Karen Kroll describes the report’s findings in Smart Cities Dive.
According to critics of the policy, “A sweep that doesn’t include services to help homeless individuals transition toward more permanent housing does little to address the underlying challenges that led to the encampment in the first place, say advocates for people who are homeless.” In the worst cases, “A sweep can set back individuals who were moving toward housing stability and, perhaps, working with a caseworker who knows where to find them.”
Activists say sweeps can be made less disruptive by providing ample notice, “intentional relationship-building” with residents to connect them to resources and services, and working with residents to help them keep their belongings, which often include important items like driver’s licenses. The report highlights a successful example from Denver, where, out of 360 people housed through a supportive housing program, 77 percent remained in stable housing three years later. “As the Denver experiment revealed, providing services that connect individuals to permanent housing is more effective than just clearing homeless encampments, a senior HUD official said.”
Read the full story: Homeless encampment sweeps costly and of limited long-term effectiveness, according to federal research
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing
The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.
Raised interest rates may kill financially vulnerable construction projects
The chief economist at ConstructConnect warns that if construction project owners are negatively impacted by the raised rates, it could result in delayed payments to contractors.
Data centers are consuming nearly 25% of Oregon’s power
The state has 111 data centers, with 32 more either planned or under construction.
A third of Texas cities must update their zoning codes to comply with new housing law
Texas municipalities are now required to allow manufactured housing in at least one residential zoning district.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Greater Baltimore Committee
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association