Inclusionary Zoning Feasible For Los Angeles
A new study finds that inclusionary zoning did not have a negative impact on housing production in California cities.
"Rosen looked at 28 California cities in Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, San Francisco and Sacramento counties, both with and without inclusionary zoning, and concluded that inclusionary zoning did not have a negative impact on housing production. Interestingly, Rosen noted that decreases in housing production most closely tracked unemployment rates and that the 1986 Tax Reform Act coincided with a sharp decrease in building."
Thanks to Christian Peralta
Published on Wednesday, May 14, 2003 in
Topics
- Urban Planning Trends to Watch in 2019
- The Year in Skyscraper Construction
- A Compelling Case for Protected Bike Lanes
- Is Pay by Distance Unfair to the Poor?
- Understanding the 'Dark Store Theory' Costing Local Governments Millions in Property Tax
- Rising Homelessness, Erroneous Data: Rethinking Utah's 'Housing First' Policy
- From Vacant Property to Affordable Housing Development
- Let's Hope Trump Considers Infrastructure a National Security Issue Too
- A Better Travel Experience
- Mall of America Gets Opportunity Zone Status
- Plan to Speed Up Relief Line Construction Pitched in Toronto
- Needed: A New Approach to the Colorado River
- Another Lawsuit Complicates Purple Line Plans in Maryland
- Bill Would Make California's Urban State HIghways Safer for Non-Motorists
- AV Investments Outpacing Consumer Demand: Report
- An Illustrated Exploration of Portland's Homeless Community
- Chicago's Pace Wants to Put More Buses on the Highway
- The Netherlands Seeks Less Confrontational Strategies to Stop Fare Evasion
- 'New Mobility' for Everyone
- Food Insecurity a Growing Problem in Louisville
