The majority of Californians want the state to keep building the California High-Speed Rail Project, which is moving ahead despite the loss of federal funding.
A new poll by the POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab reveals that 62 percent of registered voters in California support the state’s High-Speed Rail project, with 79 percent of Gen Z-aged voters in support of the train. For registered Democrats, that number jumps to 80 percent.
The results are in line with earlier polling conducted before the Trump Administration announced it was cutting $4 billion in federal funding for the project, which President Trump has repeatedly criticized as a waste of taxpayer money.
California leaders say they are pushing ahead with the project, and the state has sued the federal government over the pulled funds. “The California legislature is considering a new proposal from Newsom to invest at least $1 billion a year over 20 years in California High-Speed Rail.” Despite the Trump administration's claims that the project is a boondoggle, miles of track are already under construction in the Central Valley.
Read the full story: 62% of California Voters Want to Continue the High-Speed Rail Project, including 80% of Democrats, New Poll Finds
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority