Created in the 1970s to help boost gas mileage (with little proof that it had the desired effect), turning right on red creates dangerous situations for pedestrians and cyclists.

In an article in Fast Company, Aimee Rawlins argues that “Right-on-red is an ill-conceived traffic rule that needs to die.” As Rawlins explains, “The policy harms even those pedestrians and cyclists who avoid being struck, forcing them to maneuver around cars that have edged into crosswalks.”
Turning right on red wasn’t always legal on U.S. roads. “Until 50 years ago, only a handful of Western states permitted drivers to turn at a red light. But the 1970s oil crisis prompted the federal government to insist that states change their traffic laws, hoping that right-on-red would reduce gas consumed while cars idle at traffic lights.”
After the policy went into place, “A 1982 study found that the new policy triggered a sharp increase in crashes involving conflicts between a pedestrian or cyclist and a right-turning vehicle. In Ohio, for instance, such collisions rose 57% for pedestrians and 80% for cyclists; in Wisconsin, the figures were 107% and 72%, respectively.”
Turning right on red also frequently forces drivers into the crosswalk, says Bill Schultheiss of Toole Design. “That means you’ve denied the right-of-way to somebody walking or biking because a driver is blocking their path,” Schultheiss adds.
“Since the federal government created much of the current mess with right-on-red, it would be sensible for Congress and the U.S. Department of Transportation to help clean it up” by linking right-on-red regulations to grant funding, for example. “For the moment, the most viable path for dropping right-on-red goes through cities that control their own traffic rules.”
FULL STORY: It’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

Cal Fire Chatbot Fails to Answer Basic Questions
An AI chatbot designed to provide information about wildfires can’t answer questions about evacuation orders, among other problems.

What Happens if Trump Kills Section 8?
The Trump admin aims to slash federal rental aid by nearly half and shift distribution to states. Experts warn this could spike homelessness and destabilize communities nationwide.

Sean Duffy Targets Rainbow Crosswalks in Road Safety Efforts
Despite evidence that colorful crosswalks actually improve intersection safety — and the lack of almost any crosswalks at all on the nation’s most dangerous arterial roads — U.S. Transportation Secretary Duffy is calling on states to remove them.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Gallatin County Department of Planning & Community Development
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie