Artificial intelligence is being used to generate all kinds of content. Can it successfully replace architecture critics, or does understanding place require physical presence?

After requesting an AI-generated architectural review of the Perot Museum, Mark Lamster, writing in the Dallas Morning News, evaluates the result. Lamster annotates the review with comments, then explains the flaws found in the automatically generated critique.
“To my critical mind, the Perot’s most significant flaw is that it turns its back on the city around it, offering a cold concrete shoulder to the adjacent Arts District. Our computer-generated review suggests just the opposite. Not good.” The review remains glowing, including factual inaccuracies and misunderstandings of the museum’s role in the surrounding neighborhood. As Lamster points out, understanding a building or place requires being there. “But visiting a building in person isn’t possible if the critic isn’t a person at all.”
Because an AI program can’t ‘be there,’ it ends up, like a lazy college freshman, culling what material it can find floating around the internet and regurgitating it in a generic format.”
This may work for public relations, but not for criticism. “Indeed, one of the critic’s essential tasks is to cut through spin, to provide readers with unvarnished, informed opinion, and to do so with a bit of panache.” In Lamster’s opinion, “Of course we all want to be objective (however loaded a term that is, and especially when judging abstract arts), but who wants criticism without personal opinion?”
Ironically, when asked about the limitations of AI-produced critique, ChatGPT nails it, acknowledging its inability to replace, at least for now, human experience and knowledge. The self-awareness of that answer in itself, writes Lamster, “has me worried.”
FULL STORY: Can we replace our architecture critic with a computer? We tried it

The Right to Mobility
As we consider how to decarbonize transportation, preserving mobility, especially for lower- and middle-income people, must be a priority.

Early Sharrow Booster: ‘I Was Wrong’
The lane marking was meant to raise awareness and instill shared respect among drivers and cyclists. But their inefficiency has led supporters to denounce sharrows, pushing instead for more robust bike infrastructure that truly protects riders.

Push and Pull: The Link Between Walkability and Affordability
The increased demand for walkable urban spaces could make them more and more exclusionary if cities don’t pursue policies to limit displacement and boost affordability.

Memphis: Crime-fighting Camera Sheds Light on Police Abuse
The irony is unmistakable. Public surveillance cameras, long controversial in the criminal justice community, provided pivotal video footage of the beating of motorist Tyre Nichols by five Memphis police officers at a traffic stop on January 7.

How Autonomous Cars Could Impact Energy Use
The complex algorithms used by self-driving vehicle technology use massive amounts of energy, which could lead to a steep rise in carbon emissions as autonomous cars become more commonplace.

Safe Streets Grants Announced
The federal Safe Streets and Roads for All program funds planning and implementation for road safety projects aimed at reducing traffic deaths and building safe infrastructure for pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable road users.
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension
York County Government
York County, Human Resources
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Harvard GSD Executive Education
City of Culver City
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
City of Piedmont, CA
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.