The balance of power in the historic preservation process shifted slightly toward the preferences of property owners in Denver.
The Denver City Council recently approved a new law that provides property owners with recourse to oppose historic landmark designation.
Joe Rubino reports for the Denver Post: “The council voted unanimously Monday to grant property owners time to provide their own presentations explaining why they feel their property should not be a landmark if an application is filed against their will.”
The new law was crafted in response to the controversy surrounding a 2019 episode involving the location of Tom’s Diner at the corner of Colfax Avenue and Pearl Street in the city. The owners of the property opposed a landmark application filed for the property, and the City Council ended up stopping just short of the approval.
Previous to the new law, “applicants were given time to give a presentation stating their case for preservation but property owners had to sign up to speak as part of the broader public hearing, capping their time at three minutes,” according Rubino.
The new law will also change the process for creating historic districts in the city, according to Rubino. “Property owners in potential district boundaries can now cede their time to one speaker who can deliver a longer presentation.”
More on the controversies surrounding historic preservation in Denver is included in the source article, linked below.
FULL STORY: Citing Tom’s Diner saga, City Council tweaks Denver’s landmark ordinance
Denver Looks to Landmark Designation Changes
In the aftermath of a battle around preservation of a Denver diner, local officials are considering changes to the city’s historic landmark law.
Big Changes Coming to Denver's Downtown Historic District
A development proposal would add two new buildings in addition to major renovations in Larimer Square.
Is Washington D.C. Preserving Buildings or Hoarding Them?
A piecemeal, reactive approach to historic preservation in the capital may burden the future with too many buildings of "middling merit."
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).
The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.
Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.
This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.
Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)