Policies too narrowly focused on design can drive up the cost of construction and prevent the development of affordable housing.
Writing in Slate, Henry Grabar argues that the "battle between aesthetics and affordability" doesn't have to be a zero-sum game. "The promotion of good design in new buildings—distinct from the idea of preserving old ones—has become as much a local government objective as making sure every kid has a seat in school. Older American cities and suburbs are blanketed with zoning codes, historic districts, and design commissions that make sure communities that look nice stay looking nice."
But "a new wave of housing activists argues that this focus is a farce," a coy excuse to implement thinly veiled restrictive covenants that prevent socio-economic diversity and cause displacement of lower-income residents. "This status quo has preserved the shape of older places, but not the kinds of people who once lived there." Since the Great Recession, "we built the fewest new homes per capita of any period since World War II." The focus of historic preservation, Grabar argues, "has shifted from protecting the old to policing the new." Yet "it’s deeply human to care about what our surroundings look like," and YIMBYs must balance their interests with those of preservationists.
Zoning codes present another hurdle to increased density and affordable design. To streamline permitting and encourage construction, some cities are implementing pre-approval programs. "Los Angeles has staged a design competition for pre-approved ADU plans," and Bryan, Texas hopes to "jump-start the construction of 'missing middle housing'" through a concept they're calling "pattern zoning," which lets property owners download and customize one of four designs—"permit included."
Today, cities across the country are reckoning with the legacy of exclusionary zoning policies as "a tool of racial and socioeconomic exclusion, a relic that must be dismantled." Many have reduced or eliminated single-family zoning requirements in favor of denser development that city leaders hope will ease the affordability crisis faced by many households.
Read the full story: “Good Design” Is Making Bad Cities, but It Doesn’t Have To
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority