A new report shows that low-carbon development policies can help to achieve numerous planning goals including job creation, improved safety and public health, social inclusion, and improved accessibility.

A new report, "The Economic and Social Benefits of Low-Carbon Cities: A Systematic Review of the Evidence," by University of Leeds researchers for the New Climate Economy's Coalition for Urban Transitions, examines the economic case for climate action through more resource-efficient urban planning. This comprehensive review shows that low-carbon measures can help to achieve a range of development priorities, such as job creation, improved safety and public health, social inclusion, and improved accessibility.
Co-benefits include:
- Congestion pricing has been found to reduce traffic, travel times, and congestion 10–30% (Section 2.2).
- Policies which promote liveable density have been shown to increase urban productivity by 3% for every doubling of urban density (Section 2.3.1).
- Public transport networks can reduce transport-related injuries by up to 80% (Section 2.1.5), create direct and indirect employment (Section 2.3.2), and improve public health (Sections 2.2.1, 2.2.2, and 2.1.4).
- Health benefits from dedicated cycle lanes vary from €0.30-1.20 per km (Section 2.1.4).
- Pedestrianisation produces health benefits several times larger than cost of investments (Section 2.1.4).
This evidence suggests that the benefits of these low-carbon measures extend far beyond emission reductions. The wider economic, social, and environmental impacts may be much more valuable than the financial returns associated with climate action. This bundle of measures could therefore provide a platform for more transformative change by building public enthusiasm for low-carbon urban development, as well as the institutional capacities, financing arrangements, and learning needed for more ambitious action.
FULL STORY: The Economic and Social Benefits of Low-Carbon Cities: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and harrowing close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)