In most residential areas across the United States, recycling is encouraged and offered as a way for residents to sustainably dispose of certain materials. But how many residents actually participate in their local recycling efforts?
In most residential areas across the United States, recycling is encouraged and offered as a way for residents to sustainably dispose of certain materials. But how many residents actually participate in their local recycling efforts?
As of 2018, the national recycling rate was just over 32 percent, which was less than the rate recorded in 2015. In cities, the numbers are becoming more concerning, specifically because China has stopped importing waste. Now, many cities have scaled back or completely eliminated their recycling efforts.
The one positive aspect to increased global restrictions on importing waste is that it exposes flaws in current recycling programs, giving cities a chance to improve their measures. Expanding access to recycling programs in urban areas is essential for various reasons. Learn more below.
Recycling’s Considerable Environmental and Cost Benefits
A city’s dense, populated spaces mean residents produce consistently large amounts of waste that require proper disposal. Seeking alternative measures to traditional waste removal techniques can help cities reduce their environmental impact and increase their cost savings. That’s where recycling comes in.
While recycling may not seem too beneficial on an individual level, it’s far and away a much more sustainable approach to waste removal than traditional methods. About 94 percent of the natural resources Americans use are non-renewable. Recycling saves non-renewable resources from landfills (like the 14 million used cell phones that end up in landfills annually) leading to increased energy savings.
Relatedly, recycling often leads to higher levels of cleanliness, crucial in urban areas. A more significant rate of recycling makes for cleaner air, tidier public areas, and cleaner waterways. This factor can drastically improve residents’ quality of life, especially when it comes to the promise of a more sustainable future.
When it comes to costs, the benefits are less obvious, but still present. In some cases, it can cost anywhere from $70 to $200 per ton to collect and dispose of waste. Well-managed recycling programs can cut that down to $50 to $150 per ton. When a properly run system is in place, cities can also limit how much they spend on managing landfills.
Though reduction and reuse approaches are more beneficial overall than recycling, it’s essential to note how prioritizing recycling in cities can bring many advantages.
How Urban Communities Can Achieve Recycling Accessibility
How can cities realize the many environmental and economic advantages of recycling? It’s all about accessibility. When recycling programs come with clear, easy-to-follow steps and are available for residents throughout the various boroughs and neighborhoods of a city, more people feel inclined to participate.
Arguably, the most effective way to increase access to recycling in a city is to offer curbside recycling pickup. In many cases, when recycling is left to the individual to gather, transport, and drop off, it becomes a significant and sometimes impossible task. This is especially true in urban locations. The landscape of a city is often incredibly diverse; residents have different incomes, housing conditions, and transportation methods. While it may be easy for one person to drive to a recycling center 30 minutes across the city, that option might not exist for someone who doesn’t have a car or has no time in their week to make that trek.
Therefore, coming to the resident is crucial. By offering that recycling pickup service alongside regular trash collection, residents will find it much easier to participate in their city’s recycling program. Providing adequate recycling bins for a small fee or free of charge also helps.
Overall, cities should make it a priority to consider all of the hurdles their residents face when it comes to recycling and other eco-friendly initiatives and work to address them.
Everyone Deserves an Accessible Way to Support the Planet
When cities offer the most convenient way feasible for their residents to partake in sustainable initiatives like recycling programs, they can expect to see increased participation numbers and will enjoy the environmental and cost benefits of such a program as well.
Seattle Legalizes Co-Living
A new state law requires all Washington cities to allow co-living facilities in areas zoned for multifamily housing.
Central Florida’s SunRail Plans Major Expansion
The expanded train line will connect more destinations to the international airport and other important destinations.
NYC Officials Announce Broadway Pedestrianization Project
Two blocks of the marquee street will become mostly car-free public spaces.
Santa Monica Lowers Speed Limits
Posted speed limits will be reduced by 5 miles per hour on dozens of the city’s streets.
For Some, Co-Housing Offers Social and Economic Benefits
Residents of co-living developments say the built-in community helps ease the growing isolation felt by many Americans.
New Map Puts Bay Area Traffic Data in One Place
The Traffic Monitoring site uses community-collected speed and volume data to reveal traffic patterns on local roads.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Caltrans
Los Alamos County
American Planning Association, Sustainable Communities Division
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
City of Cambridge, Maryland
Newport County Development Council: Connect Greater Newport
Rockdale County Board of Commissioners