The controversy over the recent ballot initiative known as Measure S has Los Angeles thinking: How can the city accommodate new housing supply without disenfranchising communities?

At a recent USC Price School panel, planners, developers, and advocates discussed how Los Angeles could plan for both more housing supply and improved neighborhood equity in the aftermath of the failed Neighborhood Integrity Initiative, which helped to ignite a citywide conversation about planning and growth.
Although the city recently committed to updating community plans on a six-year cycle, former Director of City Planning Gail Goldberg maintained that the community planning effort would be hindered by the lack of a cohesive, inspiring general plan—resulting in every community coming up with its own vision, and more opposition to new development.
"I would propose that if communities have no idea where things are going, or what the ultimate result is supposed to be, it's not an illogical response to oppose new projects," she argued. Moreover, a lack of transparency and accountability leaves them apparently without recourse: "If they worked and adopted a plan that they loved, would the council honor it?"
South L.A. community organizer Damien Goodmon added that the regional and local housing crises can be situated in the context of a global interest in speculative real estate that especially impacts underserved communities. "We're not building housing for people to live in; we're building housing for investment," he said.
Before we discuss whether we need more housing and where to put it, let’s talk about protecting our existing communities. Ultimately, that forces us to talk about the challenge of gentrification—the spatial expression of economic inequality.
Goldberg, too, stressed the need for a holistic approach to planning in her call for "a new way of doing community plans."
Community plans have to be about more than just growth. They are not only about where development goes and where it doesn’t go. Community plans have to talk about the quality of life in that community, and how we make sure that along with housing come all of the other things that we all need—the jobs, the infrastructure, and the amenities that make neighborhoods great.
FULL STORY: Stewarding a Post-'Measure S' LA: Will City Leaders Truly Engage?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.

The Tiny, Adorable $7,000 Car Turning Japan Onto EVs
The single seat Mibot charges from a regular plug as quickly as an iPad, and is about half the price of an average EV.

Seattle's Plan for Adopting Driverless Cars
Equity, safety, accessibility and affordability are front of mind as the city prepares for robotaxis and other autonomous vehicles.

As Trump Phases Out FEMA, Is It Time to Flee the Floodplains?
With less federal funding available for disaster relief efforts, the need to relocate at-risk communities is more urgent than ever.

With Protected Lanes, 460% More People Commute by Bike
For those needing more ammo, more data proving what we already knew is here.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)