A newly elected member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors has proposed an expansion of rent control that would circumvent state laws that limit such measures.
Randy Shaw comments on a controversial proposal in San Francisco to expand rent control—despite a prohibition on rent control for buildings built after 1979 and for buildings under development that are built by-right. According to Shaw, "[Supervisor Aaron] Peskin correctly believes that San Francisco can require rent control and potentially even vacancy control as a condition of approving housing developments that have received special city benefits."
The article explains how the proposal would attempt to skirt state law and makes an argument for the benefits of expanded rent control. To get around the state law, the proposal would only impose rent control on buildings "that are asking the city for a significant upzoning."
"In exchange for receiving that type of major economic benefit," according to Shaw's explanation, "developers would have to agree to rent control." The article also includes more on the limitations of the proposal as well as the political path that would have to clear the way for approval.
Needless to say, the proposal is controversial. The San Francisco Chronicle editorial board produced an editorial calling the proposal a "bad idea" when it first became public news in December. Planetizen blogger Michael Lewyn has written in the past about the nearly universal opposition to rent control by economists, and as far back as 2012, multiple journalists were covering the unintended consequences of rent control in San Francisco.
FULL STORY: PESKIN’S RENT CONTROL EXPANSION: WILL IT WORK?
Reevaluating Rent Control
Cities and researchers are reconsidering the effects of the controversial housing policy known as rent control.
Ground-Breaking Rent Control Project Proposed in San Francisco
California law and a local ordinance prevent new apartment buildings from falling under rent control. But that need not prevent a developer from requesting it, as a developer in San Francisco's Excelsior District has done.
Why Rent Control is a Flawed Tool
Scott James reports on the ironic application of rent control laws in San Francisco, which results in people of relatively modest means subsidizing the housing of the extraordinarily wealthy.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.
Restaurant Patios Were a Pandemic Win — Why Were They so Hard to Keep?
Social distancing requirements and changes in travel patterns prompted cities to pilot new uses for street and sidewalk space. Then it got complicated.
In California Battle of Housing vs. Environment, Housing Just Won
A new state law significantly limits the power of CEQA, an environmental review law that served as a powerful tool for blocking new development.
Boulder Eliminates Parking Minimums Citywide
Officials estimate the cost of building a single underground parking space at up to $100,000.
Orange County, Florida Adopts Largest US “Sprawl Repair” Code
The ‘Orange Code’ seeks to rectify decades of sprawl-inducing, car-oriented development.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
JM Goldson LLC
Custer County Colorado
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Jefferson Parish Government
Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Claremont