Dr. Robert Young of UT-Austin guest blogs about his work on the challenges of promoting sustainable development in peripheral areas of Oregon.
Guest Blogger: Robert Young
My article, "The Oregon Way: Planning a sustainable economy in the American West," began from observations made while walking my dog. Having recently moved to Oregon, I was excited by the prospect of living in the purported "sustainability capital" of the planet (according to its press clippings). In contrast, while walking in my neighborhood—and later, while traveling around the state—what I was seeing (outside of a few gentrified neighborhoods) were poorly built and maintained houses, numerous working poor on the edge, and towns without any solid economic base.
This got me thinking. Oregon certainly didn't lack for indigenous raw materials or talented people seeking to enjoy the state’s ecological beauty. It also had a marked reputation for "green" living and sustainable economic development policies that reached back to the seventies. So why, as my father would say, were so many of the state's residents and towns unable to get up on their own feet? Although at the cutting edge of the sustainability discourse and considered one of the hippest places to relocate, Oregon looked more like an underdeveloped, semi-peripheral country than the beacon of New West prosperity.
To explore this question I began looking into theories of underdevelopment, including classics of the early 20th century, Latin American theorists from 1930-1970, and the work of Harold Innis, a leading Canadian economist of the early-mid 20th century. I then explored Oregon’s economic development policies and state and federal statistics from World War II to the present. The theory, policy, and numbers began to detail a very different picture of Oregon than its boosters represent. In short they reflect, as some underdevelopment theorists note, that countries in the global core have their own internal peripheries (or semi-peripheries) experiencing underdevelopment in relation to the center. At a disadvantage in terms of capital formation, skilled labor, and real economic diversification, they are subject to severe whiplash of boom-bust cycles that make sustained economic development and independence difficult at best. This seemed to accurately reflect the state's reality.
In addition to detailing Oregon's experience in this regard, I also explored the viability of "green" economic development as a strategy to break these boom-bust cycles and set the state on a new, more stable and self-reliant path. What is intriguing to me about this article is its potential to open up a different type of discussion about local and regional economic development in the United States (and perhaps even other core countries). If we begin to look at these areas as internal peripheries and semi-peripheries experiencing structural, long-term, uneven development we may find a much stronger set of theoretical and on-the-ground tools with which to promote the revitalization and redevelopment of these areas.
I believe this approach can have real value in analyzing the issues facing many different parts of the United States. I currently live in Austin, Texas, another "cutting edge," fast growing city favored by the press and people looking to relocate. Yet outside of the "live music capital of the world," Texas cities and towns have been subject to similar boom-bust cycles tied to global energy prices. Although both Texas and Oregon have boasted of diversification in their economies, the experience of much of the population in each of these states (and many others) brings the efficacy of such diversification into critical question.
Planners need to start asking whether “green” economic development can break the boom-bust cycles that leave America's internal peripheries and semi-peripheries underdeveloped. Although knowledge about the impact of sustainable development on addressing structural problems faced by rural ares is limited, my work shows promise for strategies that are strongly rooted in place, people, and ecology.
Dr. Robert Young, Assistant Professor of Planning, University of Texas at Austin
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority