Architecture Critic Mark Lamster attended the recent Congress for The New Urbanism annual conference, this year held in Dallas. One panel in particular, "How to Rebuild Architecture," proved informative.
Mark Lamster's critique of CNU 23 took the "How to Rebuild Architecture" panel from the event as its inspiration. The panel was inspired by a recent op-ed in the New York Times, authored by Steven Bingler and Martin Pedersen, and shared here on Planetizen. Lamster takes the article and the panel as fertile ground for both the state of architecture as well as the professional and political agendas of the Congress for the New Urbanism.
After distinguishing between "new urbanism" as a general concept about progressive urbanism and "New Urbanism" as an organized movement with a governing body, Lamster goes on to detail some of the highlights and controversies of the history of New Urbanism so far.
That primer leads up to Lamster's larger point about the state of contemporary architecture, which is informed by CNU's opinions about modernism and the business realities of the contemporary practice of architecture:
"And here were come to the crux of the problem with the CNU’s rebuilding architecture session. Its assumption is that the problem with the built environment, the reason that there is so much junk building out there, is because architects have lost their design principles. This gives tremendous agency to architects; the problem can be solved if only they can find the right language, the 'radical middle.'"
Lamster, however, would assign the blame for so many "boorish and boring works" to a larger cohort, including, the implication goes, planners:
"A developer looking to make a quick dollar by building and flipping property has little interest in building for the long term. In any number of ways—our building codes, our housing policies, our preservation statutes—we systemically encourage bad building."
FULL STORY: Why is so much architecture junk?

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

King County Supportive Housing Program Offers Hope for Unhoused Residents
The county is taking a ‘Housing First’ approach that prioritizes getting people into housing, then offering wraparound supportive services.

Researchers Use AI to Get Clearer Picture of US Housing
Analysts are using artificial intelligence to supercharge their research by allowing them to comb through data faster. Though these AI tools can be error prone, they save time and housing researchers are optimistic about the future.

Making Shared Micromobility More Inclusive
Cities and shared mobility system operators can do more to include people with disabilities in planning and operations, per a new report.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
planning NEXT
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie