This week residents in the North Carolina Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) will provide input on key segments of a future regional light rail system. The project has been analyzed for 15 years, yet the question of whether to build it remains.
NC planners ask: Where to build light rail (and should we still do it?)
This week residents in the North Carolina Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) will provide input on key segments of a future regional light rail system. The project has been analyzed for 15 years and is now partially funded, yet the question of whether to build it still remains.
In a series of public workshops, Triangle Transit—lead agency for the proposed 51 mile system—will seek input on specific route configurations, and among the issues are where to locate station areas and maintenance facilities, which neighborhoods to serve, and how to avoid impacting streams and wetlands.
So why are they also asking whether to build the system at all? The system is estimated at $1.34 billion, which may be contribute to lingering doubt. Several Metropolitan Planning Organizations collaborated to help develop Triangle's future transit vision, which includes increased local bus service, expanded regional bus service, and light rail. The system would serve three counties, and almost two dozen cities, as well as several major employment centers, colleges, and the Raleigh-Durham International Airport. The 3000 square mile service area includes 1.5 million residents—approximately 13% of North Carolina's statewide population—and is expected to grow to 2.5 million by 2035.
The regional transit vision relies on new revenue sources, and some local funding is already in place via sales taxes and vehicle registration fees. However a comprehensive, long-term financing strategy with state and federal support has not been secured.
In their workshops this week, Triangle Transit continues to move the project forward, working to resolve key routing questions and asking a question still on everyone's mind: Should we build it?
Read the full story: Public comments will help fix Orange-Durham light rail route
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority