Charles Marohn assesses some of the economic benefits of traditional commercial development as compared to those of auto-oriented commercial development.

In a recent piece on The American Conservative, Charles Marohn looks at his hometown of Brainerd, Minnesota to compare the economic benefits the city received from different styles of development along a single commercial corridor—three blocks originally built up in "the traditional style, with the single-story buildings pulled up to the street presenting a dilapidated front to the passing traffic."
A recent local government measure entirely changed a proximate block into an "auto-oriented" development, i.e., a drive through taco restaurant. In a comparison of total value though, the new taco joint totals $618,5000, while the dilapidated structures are valued at $1,104,500, providing the city 79 percent more in tax base revenues than the new drive through.
Marohn asks, "How is it that a collection of tiny shacks built nearly a century ago are worth so much more than the brand new development on the same acreage just up the street? The answer is revealed over and over and over and over and over again when one looks at the financial productivity of different land use patterns: the traditional development approach is a cash cow. On a per-foot or per-acre basis, it is vastly more productive financially than anything being built in an auto-orientation. Taxpayers get far greater returns when places are scaled to people instead of cars."
Marohn goes on to discuss some of the current limitations in building traditional commercial development in Brainerd and other cities in the United States.
FULL STORY: Traditional Development Is a Municipal Gold Mine

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

King County Supportive Housing Program Offers Hope for Unhoused Residents
The county is taking a ‘Housing First’ approach that prioritizes getting people into housing, then offering wraparound supportive services.

Researchers Use AI to Get Clearer Picture of US Housing
Analysts are using artificial intelligence to supercharge their research by allowing them to comb through data faster. Though these AI tools can be error prone, they save time and housing researchers are optimistic about the future.

Making Shared Micromobility More Inclusive
Cities and shared mobility system operators can do more to include people with disabilities in planning and operations, per a new report.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
planning NEXT
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie