James Brasuell discusses the contentious proposal to adopt citywide design guidelines for use by L.A.'s City Council. While the guidelines are intended to raise the level of design throughout the city, some argue they will stifle good design.
With masterworks by influential architects such as Frank Gehry, Richard Neutra, and Rudolph Schindler gracing its neighborhoods, Los Angeles has a hearty history of experimental architecture. But could such touchstones of modern architecture have been built if a set of design guidelines had been in place to mandate "good design." That's the question at the heart of a debate over the elevation of L.A. existing Citywide Design Guidelines for use by the City Council.
"The LA planning commission has used the Citywide Design Guidelines since 2011 in its advisory role on large projects and planning policies," explains Brasuell. "But according to LA city planner Deborah Kahen, the main criticism of the guidelines in that time has been a lack of teeth in enforcement. By adopting the guidelines for use by the city council, said Kahen, the new ordinance would provide a 'blanket' over the city, compensating for inadequate design standards in a patchwork of community plans."
The counter-argument, delivered by concerned architects such as Andrew Zago, is "that the guidelines might be too stifling: 'The guidelines may well prevent a lot of the worst from happening, but they may also prevent the best from happening,' he said"
"Acknowledging that the guidelines are well intentioned, Zago suggested that if the city wants to promote higher levels of design, it should develop language to empower local architects to turn the city into an incubator of architectural innovation: 'I would imagine that the city should say, ‘Wow, were [sic] leading the world in innovative architecture practices. What can we do with our codes to see some of these things happen on the streets?’”
FULL STORY: Blessing or Curse?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions