Matt Bevilacqua takes a look at a new policy proposal that could pool expertise to help municipalities better coordinate public-private partnerships, "supporting bottom-up infrastructure investment" from the top down.
When cities find themselves too strapped for cash to make necessary investments in new development and infrastructure, public-private partnerships (or PPPs, for short) often provide the capital or expertise needed to set projects in motion. In light of the pitfalls of negotiating deals between business and state, the Brookings Institute released a paper last week urging the federal government to establish a unit to harness the expertise needed to facilitate such deals.
As Bevilacqua explains, "drawing up a contract between a city and private funders can be complicated and, in some cases, politically unpalatable (New York’s PPP-backed Brooklyn Bridge Park faced criticism and even lawsuits over its funding source)." Still, PPPs have proven valuable enough for similar governmental organizations to emerge in Italy, the United Kingdom, and the Philippines.
"We hear over and over again that there is not enough capacity and expertise to get these complicated deals done," writes Robert Puentes, author of the report. "So the idea is that a sophisticated, efficient federal unit could provide that advice and technical assistance on a voluntary basis."
Bevilacqua further notes that such projects could be critical in overcoming political obstacles: "In an era when, say, state governors are rejecting federal dollars for light rail projects, shifting some responsibility onto the private sector is one way to get big-government skeptics on board with infrastructure investment."
FULL STORY: Should the Feds Have a Unit to Support Public-Private Partnerships?
Coming Soon to Ohio: The Largest Agrivoltaic Farm in the US
The ambitious 6,000-acre project will combine an 800-watt solar farm with crop and livestock production.
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
Colorado Bill Would Tie Transportation Funding to TOD
The proposed law would require cities to meet certain housing targets near transit or risk losing access to a key state highway fund.
Dallas Surburb Bans New Airbnbs
Plano’s city council banned all new permits for short-term rentals as concerns about their impacts on housing costs grow.
Divvy Introduces E-Bike Charging Docks
New, circular docks let e-bikes charge at stations, eliminating the need for frequent battery swaps.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.