Towards a More Nuanced Understanding of Density

As the land development pendulum swings back towards higher density development, from the low-density patterns of suburban sprawl, McMahon questions the common assumption made by developers and urban planners alike: "that density requires high rises: the taller, the better." Citing examples of cities and neighborhoods that achieve high levels of density without resorting to high-rises, and exhibit walkable human-scaled street level environments (which high-rises often do not), McMahon argues that, "we do not need to build thousands of look-a-like glass and steel
skyscrapers to accomplish the goals of smart growth or sustainable
development."

The recent debate about increasing height limits in Washington D.C. is just one example of a global struggle between "those who want to preserve
neighborhood integrity and those who want Trump towers and "starchitect"
skyscrapers."

"I love the skylines of New York, Chicago and many other high-rise
cities. But I also love the skylines of Washington, Charleston,
Savannah, Prague, Edinburgh, Rome and other historic mid- and low-rise
cities. It would be a tragedy to turn all of these remarkable places
into tower cities," writes McMahon.